31.7.06

Polly's Crushed Me

Oh, the humanity.

Our dearest Polly seems to have self-expression issues.

Not only is she projecting herself to be a mud-wrestling puta (see previous post), but her infamous bubblebath shot is stolen, too. I found it here. Here's her shot. Again, you be the judge.

(Sigh)

It gets worse campers. The shot that she swore again and again that was her...is itself a rip-off.

That's right, the image to your right comes from here.

So here's the truth as I see it: Polly could be a guy for all we know.

Put up or shut-up Paulina. There's no one by the name you gave on the Peoria Pundit in the phone book. Your pics are a fraud. Stay anon and be proud of it. Or come out, already. Just quit pretending to come out of the proverbial blogging closet if you're really not going to.

(I say she's Sandberg.)

19 Comments:

At 13:03, Blogger O'Brien's Briar Patch said...

How the heck did you catch the photo fabrication of Polly?

Especially the cell phone one?

 
At 13:41, Blogger C. J. Summers said...

Hmm... I don't think it's Sandberg, based on earlier posts. But it may very well be a guy!

 
At 04:14, Blogger pollypeoria said...

Hee! Hee!

 
At 12:42, Anonymous Anonymous said...

Regardless the person posting is a liar, I remember the post when he/she flat out said that the photo of the girl with glasses was authentic, the pollypeoria blog will soon cease to exist. Good riddens to a lying bag of filth.

 
At 13:47, Blogger Snarkelicious said...

Wow, Anon. Let's not get vicious here. I like Polly, after all. It's not like (s)he was caught lying under oath or anything.

I just wonder about the shot (s)he used to represent her/himself. Why that look? What's it mean? What's the story? Why not a brunette or redhead? Why glasses? What's the story?

Truth is, though, I don't care that much anymore. Polly's obviously not going to address the issue, so...

 
At 14:34, Anonymous Anonymous said...

There is no difference between lying under oath and just plain lying. The person lied, and that makes them a liar. It is not like he/she was backed into a corner and told a lie to protect his/her anonymity. The posts were made up for no reason at all, I took this photo while shaving my legs, my S.O. gave me a hard time for having the digital camera in the tub ....... this really is me at the courthouse or whatever. I mean W.T.F. that type of lying is weird and pathological, lets make up a lie for the hell of it type stuff. You have to assume at least half of everything someone like that says is crap.

 
At 01:25, Blogger O'Brien's Briar Patch said...

I'm very surprised that a particular blogger has been unusually quiet on this topic.

Very odd.

Especially since he is always going on about the integrity of bloggers and journalists.

 
At 09:28, Blogger SA said...

Could it be? Polly is really Billy?

 
At 11:13, Blogger Snarkelicious said...

Now, THAT was a disturbing thought!

But, no, too many political differences...unless their real name is Sybil, that is.

 
At 12:30, Blogger PeoriaIllinoisan said...

That would also mean Billy's been flirting with himself.

 
At 13:50, Anonymous Billy Dennis said...

I'm delinking all you sick twisted freeks.

;-)

 
At 14:02, Blogger Vonster said...

Crap - and I thought Polly had a little bit of a Tea Leoni thing going on......

 
At 14:06, Blogger Snarkelicious said...

Sick?

We're not the ones making goo-goo words at ourselves, Billy boy.

 
At 14:08, Blogger pollypeoria said...

Gosh Anonymous, so sorry I offended you! Kind of. Okay, not really.

I admit in addition to spewing my haute opinions on my blog I also strive to entertain. The truth -that I am in fact a very hairy, yet very balding, 4'2", 360 pound, vigin telemarketer- just wouldn't be as compelling, fetching, or as fun as being Polly.

If the PBS NewsHour with Jim Leher- a highly interesting and informative show- were actually the News Hour anchored a Victoria Secret supermodel, a model/anchor with a genius I.Q., a talented journalist and interviewer, and said model/anchor wore a revealing lacey undergarment while educating us on the world's woes... well, don't you think Americans would be much, much, MUCH better informed?

My blog accurately represents my opinons and my sense of humor (and regular musings that serve/attempt to build up/maintain my faux persona and protect my identity. It is MY blog. It is not the New York Times or Leher Newshour. Yeah, there are lies/fantasy/fun incorporated into PollyPeoria. If you find that sick, twisted, and pathological Anon, I don't blame you for not reading PollyPeoria anymore- and I'm not offended.

(By the way, that 1-900-Hot-Girl number you've been dialing? Those girls ain't hot. Far from it. Trust me. I KNOW.

Oh! And the WWF professional wrestling you always TIVO. Not professional. Not really wrestling. All fake. Fake. Fake.

Enjoy your pedestal Anon. I'll continue to enjoy fake mud wrestling.)

Best wishes,

Polly

 
At 16:13, Blogger Chase Ingersoll said...

So was it true or untrue when Polly Peoria stated that she actually went out to the Grandview Hotel and was at court hearings?

The problem is that over the last year, she has expressed more than opinion, she has alleged personal knowledge of facts.

And it is far different to attack someone where people can openly consider the source and question the source's credibility and know where to start to verify their allegations, than to remain anonymous and even while contradicing the facts of people like myself who personally put ourselves and sitautions out there to be verified by the public.

 
At 17:12, Blogger O'Brien's Briar Patch said...

Hm.....doesn't this really describe someone we know?!?!?!?!



"The truth -that I am in fact a very hairy, yet very balding, 4'2", 360 pound, vigin telemarketer- just wouldn't be as compelling, fetching, or as fun as being Polly."

 
At 12:35, Blogger pollypeoria said...

Chase,

Some posts are fun i.e., bubble baths and mud wrestling and also serve to protect my real and quite dull identity.

Other posts are not fun and games but my opinions on heated issues.
I would think a person of your supposed intelligence would be able to discern the difference.

As far as,

"And it is far different to attack someone where people can openly consider the source and question the source's credibility and know where to start to verify their allegations, than to remain anonymous and even while contradicing the facts of people like myself who personally put ourselves and sitautions out there to be verified by the public."

You have commented NUMEROUS times on my blog anonymously Chase. No-one believes your explanation that it was down and out Grandview residents with swank laptaps utilizing the hotel's wi-fi.

You put yourself "out there" when and if you feel like it, and when and if it suits you. That's America, that's the internet, that's your right. As well as mine.

I think PollyPeoria posts of a more serious nature speak for themselves as to credibilty. Either you believe Polly is an intelligent creature with opinions worth considering, or you think she is full of crap. You are free to log on to the blog or not, as it suits you. I never buy or read the National Inquirer.

Any "attacks" made on your crediblity, Chase, were in the public domain and common knowledge-i.e., being disbarred, etc. Anyone could check out the accusations just by going to the Illinois Bar website, county clerk, etc. You have earned your reputation for being dishonest and untrustworthy (in far more serious matters than silly internet pics). Your lack of integrity is well documented.

However, when you go attack Chase you make lurid, unfounded accusations- questioning a person's sexuality, fidelity, or allege those you dislike have actually committed serious crimes (which they have never been charged with let alone convicted of).

Don't get high and mighty Chase. Stay hidden in the sewer where you belong and I will stay in virtual reality... mud wrestling.

 
At 14:59, Blogger Snarkelicious said...

Chase can point the focus of any discussion on any topic towards himself. It's a remarkable gift, I think.

Well, Polly person, you continue to intrigue me. And unlike the vitriolic anon, I'm not going to stop reading...

 
At 08:45, Blogger Mahkno said...

I think this all says more about Snarker than Polly... how on earth he found these pictures among the 1000s of picture sites is beyond me. Unless of course he is trolling 1000s of picture sites, whatever for we do not know. Surely not to find polly pics.

 

Post a Comment

Links to this post:

Create a Link

<< Home